On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 03:54:03PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > That is a personal question of taste. Why to try to unify GR and QM? > If they works well in their domain, we could just keep both. But
There are physical domains where both theories are required. For example the nature of the event horizon of a black hole, which is currently not well described theoretically (eg the firewall problem). So its not just a question of personal taste, at least if you're an astrophysicist. Six pack Joe could probably get by fine without either Relativity or QM, of course :). Cheers -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Senior Research Fellow hpco...@hpcoders.com.au Economics, Kingston University http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
