You mean the help files that are written for helping people help
people?? You can read those things and find answers?? NO WAY....
William : YES WAY !
Kevinm : NO WAY , You totally cannot find answers from reading, DUDE??
William : YES WAY DUDE!
Kevinm QWSZC, VRY+Y, NFH, SAD-VF, DERSDESDFG
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
More letters after my name makes me Smarter.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
please respond back to rent this ad space for your needs
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics,
William
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Admin Assigned Signature?
Actually, I find the Exchange2000 help to be excellent. Granted, it's
not a manual per sé.
I've copied the exadmin.chm to my workstation and read parts almost as a
manual. I'm impressed with it.
SQL2000 BOL is also quite good.
William
-----Original Message-----
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Admin Assigned Signature?
RTFM? RTFM!!
WHO gets manuals anymore?
We gots to go out and buy 3rd party books any more to get decent (read
ANY) documentation.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a
difficult one. - Bruce Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Morrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Admin Assigned Signature?
I find it really amusing that the reason people tend to answer FAQ &
RTFM questions, like the one I (guiltily) posted last evening, with
remarks like some of those below is to discourage erroneous messages
from cluttering up a very valuable resource (this list)......and yet
those same folks continuously babble on about it ..... Thus cluttering
up the list even more.
Enough said. That's the last you'll hear on the topic from me.......and
for all you others out there....my apologies for contributing to the
clutter at this point.
Enjoy
-----Original Message-----
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: August 16, 2001 12:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Admin Assigned Signature?
Now *that* could be construed as a sarcastic answer!
Les Bessant mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager, Sanderson Townend & Gilbert
Acting in a personal capacity
http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce!
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 2:20 PM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: RE: Admin Assigned Signature?
>
>
>Methinks I've heard this question once or twice before in the last few
>weeks. It's been fery Frequently Asked. If there was a list of
>something that had answers to these <FONT SIZE=1000>F</FONT><FONT
>SIZE=1>requently
></FONT><FONT SIZE=1000>A</FONT><FONT SIZE=1>sked</FONT> <FONT
>SIZE=1000>Q</FONT><FONT SIZE=1>uestions </FONT> somewhere, that might
>help...
>
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
