nope. there are no mailboxes on the e5.5 server. -----Original Message----- From: Barb McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2002 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing last Exchange 5.5 from e2k
Are there any mailboxes that need to send Internet mail still on the 5.5 server? -----Original Message----- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing last Exchange 5.5 from e2k Also, if I remove the e5.5 IMC, will e5.5 detect the IMC on the e2k server? (the e2k connector does not appear in the connectors part of exchange administrator.... MP -----Original Message----- From: Barb McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2002 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing last Exchange 5.5 from e2k Did you delete the 5.5 IMS? If not you need to and let the SMTP Servers in EX2k take over? As long as there is a 5.5IMS in the ORG it will be the preferred route for Internet mail. Also make sure your Firewall understands that the E2K Server(s) are allowed to send/receive SMTP via Port 25. Look at Q272314 and Q284148 for the detailed procedures for retiring the 5.5 server. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Removing last Exchange 5.5 from e2k Hi, Although I have followed Q152959.. I still have an issue: I have 2 e2k SP1 servers (one with a Internet mail connector) and 1 e5.5 SP4 server (second internet mail connector with cost=100). The Routing Calculation Server is set to be the e2k server with the mail connector. When I look at the routing tab in the Site Addressing properties on e5.5 server, the more expensive SMTP conector is listed as the SMTP route. This is affecting inbound / outbound mail for the second e2k server who still thinks the e5.5 server has the IMC. When I click re-calculate routing, nothing changes. I don't think the e5.5 server is aware of the e2k IMC... Is it just a matter of upgrading the e5.5 server to e2k, and letting exchange routing sort itself out?? Then removing the 2nd and more expensive IMC? Any comments or suggestions would be appreciated.. Thanks, MP _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]