I used ADMT to migrate the accounts, then set up the ADC, which populated
the accounts with the Exchange info. I did not use ADClean. I ran the LDAP
query today suggested in Q309222, the value you mention is not populated for
any users.

Ran into another situation today that may be related. I moved a couple of
mailboxes yesterday, two of which were a manager and his assistant. The
assistant had delegate permissions to the managers mailbox. This morning she
cannot access any folders from the manager's mailbox. Default permissions
will work, but any user specific permissions do not get applied/checked.

Any suggestions on this? I am leaning toward login account issues, being
that everyone is still logging in with their NT 4 account.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Move


Did you use ADMT to clone NT4 SIDs onto ADC-created AD account Sidhistories
or did you use the ADClean method to merge separate accounts created by
ADMT?  

Regardless I'd take a look at Q309222 and check that the
msexchmasteraccountsid value is not populated for enabled users in AD.  Also
if you look at their mailboxes using the Exchange 55 Admin tool connected to
an Exchange 55 server, ensure that the Primary Windows NT account is set to
be their new AD account if they are using that AD account or the NT4 account
if they are still using that one.  Also check in the Permissions tab to see
if the account has full User permissions since the ADC has a habit of
changing it to Custom.

Mark


-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Anelick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 25 June 2002 14:54
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Move


Yes.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Move


Can you see the PF hierarchy in ESM?

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Anelick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 25 June 2002 14:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Move


Sorry, forgot to include that info. Yes, the 2000 domain is in native mode.
The DL replicated as universal security groups into AD, and the membership
was also correct. Also, the permissions are not limited to DLs, as my
account is listed separately as an owner for some of these folders.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Move


Is the Windows 2000 domain native mode?  Maybe you have a permissions issue
with public folders using distribution lists for authentication?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Anelick
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Move


I am in the process of migrating all of my users (135) to an E2K box. I have
looked at Ed's Server Move doc from the FAQ. Here is what the system looks
like right now.

Old server - NT 4 SP6a, Exch. 5.5 SP4, Domain A
New server - 2000 SP2, Exch. 2000 SP2, Domain B

A two-way trust is set up between the new domains. I have installed the new
server into the existing site and set up the replication agreements. I
migrated all the user accounts with ADMT. So far so good, everything
replicated back to AD. I then went about replicating some PF to the new
server. As soon as the replication took place, I could not view anything in
or below a second level folder. For example:

All Public Folders-|
                         |
                          --Org-|
                                  |
                                  ---Dept-|
                                            |
                                            ---Folder

Once replicated, I cannot view any items in the 'Dept.' folder, nor can I
see the 'Folder' item in the hierarchy view. The folders were still homed on
the 5.5 server. I was pretty sure that this all worked OK on my test server
so I am not sure what I am missing.

Few more details: All of the users are still using their Domain A login
accounts (SID History was migrated to Domain B accounts). Permissions were
replicated exactly as they were on 5.5 to the PF. Default permissions are
set to none for the folder I am having problems with. I can change default
permission to reviewer, and then I can have full access to the folder (I
have Owner rights). I am suspecting it has something to do with the domain
accounts they are logging into/trusts, but am not sure where to go from
here. Anyone seen anything or know anything about this problem? Any help
would be appreciated.

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal
views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you
have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use,
copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and
notify the sender immediately. 
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent
or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this.


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal
views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not
use,
copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and
notify
the sender immediately. 
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent
or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this.


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to