I suggest you test a real restore at some point. Even just doing a file
restore is not pretty in ArghServ

--------------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry, Christopher M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 3:20 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup
> 
> 
> I don't know if this makes a difference or not, but the setup I use is
> this:
> 
> ARCserve machine installed using MSSQL database
> I backup everything to a SCSI Array (I keep 5 days backup on the array
> of all servers)
> Every night I dump everything to tape (LTO 100/200)
> 
> So I have never had to restore anything from tape. And I also 
> do a full
> backup of the backup server to tape. So the worst case is I 
> will have to
> restore the backup server then restore all my other servers once the
> backup server is up or restore each server individually.
> 
> You might laugh at this method, but it works.
> 
> 
> Christopher
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:17 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup
> 
> 
> Be sure to tell us how well the restore goes...  It's not 
> that we don't
> like it because it doesn't backup; it has a serious problem with
> restoring...
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry, Christopher M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 8:22 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup
> 
> 
> Why is everyone against ARCserve? I have been using ARCserve 
> v. 9.01 to
> do brick level backups and I have never have a problem with it. The
> largest mailbox that I do a brick level backup on is 729megs 
> and most of
> the mailboxes are over 100megs. I have never had a failed job 
> and I have
> done successful restores. I would have to say the ARCserve 9.01 is a
> solid product it is a 200% improvement over ARCserve 7. The only bad
> thing I can say is that it is a little on the expensive side, 
> but I use
> it to backup 6 servers and 3 databases.
> 
> 
> Chris 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&
lang
=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to