On 30/07/2024 12:52, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
*If* I extended the config to allow admins to set the OpenSSL option SSL_OP_IGNORE_UNEXPECTED_EOF (and an equivalent gnutls option if I can find one) which ignores this detection, would you accept it into the exim code base ?
Probably - subject to documentation, working decently against older library versions, project coding standards, and investigating whether existing coding does anything in any (other) specific situation that renders it not needed.
I realise that giving admins more options to fiddle gives them more rope to hang themselves, so this would be a build-time option.
Mmm. I'm less certain on that. Having more build-variants to test is in itself a major project cost. -- Cheers, Jeremy -- ## subscription configuration (requires account): ## https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/ ## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account): ## exim-users-unsubscr...@lists.exim.org ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
