--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, freeradicalfederation <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander > > <mailander111@> wrote: > > > > > > It is true that it is extraordinarily difficult to > > > distinguish between a cause and a correlation, but why > > > are so sure, Off, that this is a correlation?>> > > > > Because i haven't seen any evidence and i don't think this has been > > published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Therefore it is not > > credible. And I have never heard of anyone ever saying this effect > > before. > > > > OffWorld > > > > > > > OffWord - you shouldn't have to wonder whether this has been > published. I specifically said in my earlier post it was unpublished > data. If you can conclude that all unpublished data is not credible, > then you are seriously closed minded. Much of the most valuable > knowledge we have (including Vedic knowledge) is not published in any > peer-reviewed scientific journal. > > Furthermore, some people choose not to publish good scientific data > for a variety of reasons. So far, we have chosen not to publish this. > That could change in the future, but we have no plans nor any desire > at this point to go down that path. > > I will say that the more TMers I encounter who dispute this data > without even asking intelligent questions, the more I feel it should > be published. However, my more pressing desire is to understand what > is happening. Why would TM increase eye pressure? That's the main > interest.
I think you made up the whole thing.
