--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Oct 15, 2008, at 5:54 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote: > > > again you reach for the superficial-- distinctions in time and space > > are no validation or refutation of consciousness. and the vedas can > > never be written down unless we have no need for them. > > > Ah, feigning "the eternal Ved", gotta love that MMY programming! The > apurusheya-bhasya should be out anyday...but what we really need to do > is get our own. > > The eternal Ved is not what I'm speaking of so I think you missed your > "object". The Ved I'm speaking of is considered canonical and fixed > and unalterable. Solid as the caste mind-enslavement system it was > built around. We live in a multiverse of impermanence. > > That doesn't mean I have to suffer NeoVed-bots, please spare me the > sentiment my dear unless you have something substantive to share. :-) >
arguing against the dogma of the written vedas is like shooting fish in a barrel to my way of thinking- you certainly do not appear any more learned for having done so.
