--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert" <babajii_99@> wrote: > > > > (snip) > > > > > > Your hypocrisy is stunning, Curtis. You've seen the > > > misogynistic vomit (including death threats) hurled > > > at me and raunchydog and other women who attempt to > > > post here, not to mention at Hillary and Sarah Palin > > > and Cindy McCain and even Jackie Kennedy. > > > > > > You have no excuse. > > > > Women, Can't Live with 'em, can't live without 'em. > > I'm not sure who you're quoting, Robert, > but I can guess. Therefore I demand that > she back up her claim of "death threats" > made *on this forum* against "her and > Raunchydog and other women who attempt > to post here." I want the exact quotes, > and the message numbers of the posts in > which these "death threats" were made. > > And there have to be *three* such "threats," > because she listed at least three supposed > targets of those threats.
Nope, I did no such thing, sorry. I referred to "misogynistic vomit" that *included* death threats and mentioned a range of targets without specifying who among those targets has been subjected to the death threats and who has been subjected merely to the other misogynistic vomit. Barry's a writer with a good grasp of semantics, so he's well aware of this. <snip> > Remember, the "death > threats" in question have to be something that > anyone here, regardless of their political views, > would see as an actual, real, death threat, some- > thing that if they saw it in another context, > they would feel duty-bound to report to the police. Unfortunately, Barry does not get to define what *I* mean by "death threats" in such a way as to conveniently exclude the death threats he made against raunchydog and me.
