Hugo wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Because the generals are no good a video games. It takes the >> > younger > >> recruits who they filtered out and found good at games to do such >> > remote > >> flying. It also takes specialized people to fly the drones. Ever >> > try > >> to fly a toy remote controlled airplane? >> > > Yep, takes about ten minutes to learn and if you're not > planning to land... > Well gee, maybe they should have hired you then. :-D
> Besides someone must have taught the guys to fly these > drones, someone in charge perhaps? No, they would have attended specialized training from people who were specialized in that system. The military has been licking their chops at all this kids who have played video games since childhood and what expert remote weapons people they make. Maybe some of them in 10 years will be high ranking but not now. I know about the video game stuff because I've worked in that industry for years. > > > >>> That's the trouble with all the 9/11 conspiracy theories they >>> are so complex and involve thousands keeping silent and >>> incredible new technology like explosives that don't make any >>> noise and buildings you can demolish without the usual hassle >>> of taking down interior walls and tying the opposite corners >>> together. >>> >>> >> Nope, it wouldn't take thousands to pull this off. The explosives >> > made > >> noise as fire fighters reported. >> >>> None of them are as convincing as the idea that a bunch of >>> religious maniacs hi-jacked some planes and flew them into >>> public buildings all over the US. Simple, effective. >>> > > > >> "Religious maniacs" who could barely fly a Cessna and spent the >> > prior evening at a strip club? > > Strip club eh? Probably rehearsing for those 72 virgins. Bunch of > hypocrites. > > The people on united 93 phoned their friends and family and > told them what was going on so it must have been arabs with > *some* flying skill. > You can't call from a cell phone at that altitude in a jet. Some believe that the calls were made from a hanger in Cleveland where Flight 93 landed due to a "bomb threat." On one call left on an answering machine there is a bankground voice of a woman saying "you did good" as the caller was hanging up. > And an FBI agent reported that there were many middle eastern men > taking flying lessons in Arizona. Let's face it they didn't need to > know how to take off and land so how hard could it be? There is a huge difference between a Boeing passenger jet and a Cessna. It can be quite hard as many airline pilots have pointed out. Also many airline pilots say they themselves could not have made the maneuvers that the supposed jet that hit the Pentagon made. Also folks at the Boeing planet in Seattle might find the notion that the wings folded up and collapsed into the hole, laughable. That's not how the planes are built. Sorry, but I don't buy the 19 "arabs" (many who are still alive) armed with box cutters conspiracy theory as many who have taken the time to look into and read the reports (even just the ones which contain only news reports) don't either. Some people like to adopt the "official version" because if it proves to be wrong then they are off the hook. It takes a braver person to espouse that the "official version" is wrong and something else was going on. Why not explore the possibilities?
