Ouch! I've been concerned for Curtis' nutsack for some time now. However, I thought Barry, would have been the one to deliver the blow (so to speak). High five ya, sister.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Looks like I managed to kick Curtis in the balls > (metaphorically, of course) hard enough that all > he can do is sputter. > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > No, it's the men who hide behind faux feminism > > > > With you as the sole judge of what's faux and what's fer real real > no > > doubt. I'm gunna have to go with the actual rather than virtual > women > > in my world on this one, sorry. And sorry to say I'm also not gunna > > run them by your official judgment first. > > > > and> self-righteously > > > > > Ouch! Gotta get in the digs don'tcha. Feel better now? > > > > <insist they and their "brothers"> > > > > I could almost hear you spit that word out. So you can express > > solidarity with women but if I do it with certain men I am > > contemptible. I see a pattern here. > > > > > are not the enemy, who close their eyes and ears > > > to what's going on > > > > Or have a different opinion to what is going on. How about that > option? > > > > while fatuously proclaiming their > > > innocence and good intentions. > > > > > > Your hypocrisy is stunning, Curtis. > > > > You are easily stunned. > > > > You've seen the> misogynistic vomit> > > > > I've seen people jerking your chain. You're predictability is > stunning > > Judy. SNAP! > > > > (including death threats) > > > > I'm with Turk on this one. How about some proof on this? > > > > hurled> at me and raunchydog and other women who attempt to > > > post here, > > > > And you would like some special treatment perhaps? Very feminist! > > Right on sista, special protective treatment for all women so they > can > > be equal. "attempt to post here?" WTF, Raunchy seems to be doing > > just fine. > > > > not to mention at Hillary and Sarah Palin > > > and Cindy McCain and even Jackie Kennedy. > > > > Did people on a public forum say bad things about public people? > > that's a first. Thanks for pointing that out, I'll get right on > > stopping all of that immediately. I'm just glad to hear than male > > public figures have not been subjected to this kind of verbal > assault. > > (with the possible exception of my calling Guru Dev a hobo) > > > > > > You have no excuse. > > > > And your assumption that I need one show one of the many differences > > in how we approach other people Judy. > > > > You are running old school feminism that verges on being a man > hater. > > Good luck with that strategy. I think it is time to put you BF > online > > so we can determine if you have damaged our brother's self-esteem > with > > your aggressive form of assumptively judgmental feminism. > > > > I'll buy the negative effect of language on young women who are > > forming their identity. But at our ages we have no excuse for being > > so touchy that we equate language with actual physical violence to > > women. You are missing a critical distinction in your zeal to make > > men wrong. > > > > See ya at the Wymin's Djimbe drum circle at Dupont Circle in D.C. > > Everyone is gunna get tribal tattoo armbands and talk about how > > terribly Guy Ritchie treated Madonna over a steamy cup of miso. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > The guys you are dogging out all have > > > > loving relationships with the women in their lives > > > > > > Whether it's even the case that all the men on this > > > forum *have* women in their lives, the fact is that a > > > large percentage of men who abuse women would smugly > > > declare they had "loving relationships" with those > > > women. > > > > > > and you ought to > > > > trust your sisters on the ground about these men. > > > > > > I don't believe we've heard from your girlfriend > > > lately, or any of the wives or girlfriends (or even > > > the one-night stands) of the men on this forum. What > > > "sisters on the ground" are there for us to "trust" > > > with regard to the behavior of the men on FFL? > > > > > > We see how the men here treat *us*. And we see how > > > our "sisters on the ground" are treated in the > > > quotes raunchydog posted. We see how Hillary and > > > Sarah Palin and Cindy McCain and Jackie Kennedy > > > have been treated here. > > > > > > > The ones you should watch IMO, hide behind religious piety > > > > and their purity from "low" desires. > > > > > > No, it's the men who hide behind faux feminism and > > > self-righteously insist they and their "brothers" > > > are not the enemy, who close their eyes and ears > > > to what's going on while fatuously proclaiming their > > > innocence and good intentions. > > > > > > Your hypocrisy is stunning, Curtis. You've seen the > > > misogynistic vomit (including death threats) hurled > > > at me and raunchydog and other women who attempt to > > > post here, not to mention at Hillary and Sarah Palin > > > and Cindy McCain and even Jackie Kennedy. > > > > > > You have no excuse. > > > > > >
