You betcha!

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> wrote:
> >
> > Curtis defends his manly parts against violent language, and in the
> > same breath justifies violent language that incites misogyny. To his
> > credit, he notes we should protect young girls' self-esteem by not
> > referring to them as cunts. So at what age can we begin to call a
> girl> as a cunt? His gratuitous offer of compassion for young females
> shows> a glimmer of awareness that words matter. There's hope.
> 
> If it helps any I would prefer to hear Sarah Palin called a "dipshit"
> rather than a "cunt."  Does that earn me any old school feminist
points?  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
> > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@>
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Looks like I managed to kick Curtis in the balls
> > > > > (metaphorically, of course) hard enough that all
> > > > > he can do is sputter.
> > > > 
> > > > Your violent metaphor is offensive.  For a man it is the
> > > > equivalent to having something inserted into your body
> > > > and damaging an internal organ.  Funny?
> > > > 
> > > > The fact that you don't understand the hypocrisy of using such
> > > > language after taking everyone here to task for the same thing
> > > > makes me sputter.
> > > 
> > > <belly laugh>
> > > 
> > > Curtis, why do you think I said that?
> > > 
> > > You *freak out* when someone uses violent language
> > > about you, but you deny that it should give any
> > > offense when it's used about women--and without
> > > even a parenthetical that it's just a metaphor.
> > > 
> > > Who's the hypocrite, again?
> > > 
> > > I really didn't think you'd fall into the trap, but
> > > I figured, what the hell, it's worth a try. Glad
> > > I chanced it.
> > > 
> > >   You might want to have the tendency to resort to violent
> > > > fantasies instead of dealing with the points I made, checked.
> > > 
> > > You didn't *make* any points in this post, Curtis.
> > > That's why I said you were reduced to sputtering.
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to