Judy , I saw the Breitbart video the first day it appeared. It was posted on
The
Drudge Report and I'm almost 100% sure, right at the end, that it does have the
part about her *epiphany* though not her whole explanation for it. According to
Andrew Brietbart, this was never about Shirley Sherrod, but about NAACP member
reactions to her statement at 17:28.
You also, in an earlier post, called Breitbart a racist without backing it up.
Must we assume that if you don't support Obama policies then you are a racist?
________________________________
From: authfriend <jst...@panix.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, July 26, 2010 4:49:07 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Obama afraid of Glenn Beck?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" <willy...@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > > In other words, Breitbart is lying about the
> > > > audience's expectations as well. She told them
> > > > *in advance* she had undergone an epiphany,
> > > > and they very clearly approved of the outcome
> > > > before she'd said a word about the farmer...
> > > >
> > > So, if she told them in advance about her epiphany,
> > > wouldn't that be a tip-off for the NAACP to watch
> > > the entire video BEFORE they called for her ouster?
> > >
> authfriend:
> > Not sure how it would be a tipoff to the NAACP if the
> > NAACP didn't know about it. (As you know, she gave her
> > speech to a local chapter; it was the national
> > organization that denounced her.)
> >
> > > They didn't even see the edited clip, apparently!
> > >
> > Yes, they did. That's the basis on which they
> > denounced Sherrod.
> >
> So, you're thinking the national organization didn't
> see Sherrod announce the epiphany which came before she
> said a word about the farmer?
>
> I would have thought that the NACCP would have at least
> seen the edited clip.
As you know, that wasn't in Breitbart's video.
