--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Oct 27, 2006, at 1:41 PM, jim_flanegin wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Oct 27, 2006, at 10:40 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: > >> > >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie <ltm457@> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> He knew what it was supposed to do. He maybe did not know > >>>> that mechanics of how it would go. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Just a question -- do you (or, for that matter, > >>> does *anyone* here) actually believe that Patanjali's > >>> technique involved thinking "relationship of body and > >>> akasha...lightness of cotton fiber" in ANY language, > >>> much less English? > >>> > >>> It *astounds* me that people still believe that what > >>> Maharishi sold to them is what Patanjali had in mind. > >> > >> And of course I had posted a while back the comments of Tat Whale > >> Baba's successor who stated that it had to be done in Sanskrit. > >> Levitation actually involves two sutras, not one, and a mastery of > > a > >> certain form of prana, which is very dangerous without very close > >> personal instruction. Hopping actually is another siddhi, the > >> bhuchari siddhi, the siddhi of hopping like a frog... > >> > > I suppose it comes down to whether I believe your interpretation of > > what Tat Whale Baba's successor said, and how you interpret the TM- > > Sidhis sutras vs. how Maharishi has brought them out. > > > > Given my own results and assuming myself to be quite an ordinary > > person, and therefore not prone to extraordinary spiritual results, > > I have to say that Maharishi's TM-Siddhis program works exactly as > > advertised; ridding the nervous system of deep stresses and > > preparing the practitioner for Self Realization. > > > > If what you are raising are academic quibbles over the program, I > > agree that there may be some insignificant distinctions noted. > > However, these are of no consequence practically. I practiced the > > full TM-Siddhis program for about 13 years, twice a day. > > I think the point is, despite the fact many of us had great > experiences with our programs, myself included, there is no one who > has full perfection of all of them. > > And of course the question that raises is "why not?". >
Yeah, after all, you're perfect in every other way... To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
