Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov <lemen...@gmail.com> 2009-06-22 07:01:17 EDT --- Notes: * Current naming scheme looks unclear at least for me. Why not to split packages into %{name}-MySQL, %{name}-ODBC and %{name}-ZIP instead of %{name}-extra. * I don't fully understand why we need specific %{name}-debug package. We already have %{name}-debuginfo. In any case I think %{name}-debug should be splitted into %{name}-debug and %{name}-extra-debug packages (in conformance with main two packages). However, I don't insist you to fully satisfy these two requests, but you should comment them. * "BuildRequires: /usr/bin/perl" - why not to use "BuildRequires: perl" ? Other things looks sane. Here is a koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1429077 * rpmlint is almost silent (two warnings may be ignored): [pe...@workplace Desktop]$ rpmlint poco-* poco-debug.i586: W: no-documentation poco-extra.i586: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [pe...@workplace Desktop]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
