Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548092 Richard Hughes <rhug...@redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhug...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Richard Hughes <rhug...@redhat.com> 2009-12-18 06:02:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > * Provide downloadable Source0 Done. > * Fix License field in spec-file Done > * Package must own %{_datadir}/color/targets dir Done > * Relocate docs related to Wolf Faust's work. Not done. Programs such as gnome-color-manager are expecting them to be in /usr/share/share-color-targets/$(VENDOR)/{README|LICENSE} -- this is so the user can click a link to the target readme or licence in the GUI and it will be displayed automatically. They shouldn't be listed as doc files as if they are missing then clients can't display the licence of the targets, which is bad. I hope this is okay, as functionality in the GUI client depends on the fact they are present, and named in this way. Richard. New spec file: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/shared-color-targets.spec New SRPM: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/shared-color-targets-0.0.1-0.7.20091218git.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
