Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Cache-Mmap - Shared data cache using memory mapped files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211317 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-19 03:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I didn't think it was significant, since it is a %doc file. (And note that I > chmod a-x the thing in %prep, so there's no danger of mistaking it for a real > script, and it isn't causing any new dependencies.) Indeed, and that's why I don't make it a blocker. > In other words, I'd prefer to leave it as-is. Besides, I have to assume > upstream had some reason for it... Some reason we don't care about. In fedora it would be better in my opinion if a user wouldn't have to guess why the shebang is like that and whether he has to install something else to have the package work. This example is meant to be read, so it should be as correct as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
