Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426883 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |m) ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-18 09:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > The reason for patch was to get it building on GCJ, however it does build > without the patch on the OpenJDK. What would be the right thing do here, drop > support for GCJ in favour of less modifications to the upstream code? I think what you've done is fine. If someone notices problems with brazil on its own, we can always revert the patch. Please post new URLs when you have them for the grammatical changes (if you're going to change them ... they're not blockers). spot: I'm putting the ball in your court here for a decision on the click-through situation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
