Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462560 --- Comment #1 from John Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-17 00:16:21 EDT --- I do have a small question about how the release tag should be numbered. On the upstream web site, they only have downloadable ZIP files for versions up to 1.1.3.4c. However, in their CVS tree they have tags for 1_1_4 and 1_1_4b. (I grabbed that last tag as I documented in the .spec file.) Since, I grabbed the code out of CVS, should there be a "cvs" string in the release, or is that not necessary since I was grabbing a specific CVS tag? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
