> 在 2020年1月31日，下午8:07，Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> 写道： > > Liu Steven (12020-01-31): >> for example: https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/list/?series=250 > > Yes, I saw it shortly afterwards. Seems misguided: same result for a > protocol not found (normal behavior, must be handled) and for a clumsy > programmer. I like it better when the core functions are strict, unless > when there is a significant benefit. > > Also, it is abusing an undocumented behavior. Just more safe than without check. I think if it return -EINVAL maybe better than NULL, is it? > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas George > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Steven Thanks _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
