Peter O'Gorman wrote:
I'm kind of late into the fray here (had a short vacation), but would suggest that we notify submitters that we prefer .info and .patch files to be placed in the public domain, but that explicit licenses can be added to comments in the .info file, or the patch file, if required.
The GPL is a dangerous default license, in my opinion, the default should be
the easiest to copy while allowing people the option to make their files
more restrictive.
+1
I think public domain is a good idea for such things.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc: A global provider of Threat Management Solutions. Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today! http://www.demarc.com/Info/Sentarus/hamr30 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
