Hi, > >> I am finishing up my work on a system-texlive package. It will > >> also > >> have tetex-base-texlive and tetex-texmf-texlive packages.
That's great to hear ! > > If I understand well, the latter two build everything from source ? > Nope, they depend on system-texlive, provide tetex-base and tetex- > texmf (respectively), and also depend on a few other things that > teTeX provides but TeX Live does not. They're both non-source > packages. Maybe naming them tetex-base-system-texlive would be better then (in addition to competing for the longest package name). Are you considering a texlive (i.e. from source) package as well ? Or is that an obviously bad idea ? One advantage would be sharing of the texmf tree with additional Fink packages. But compiling TeXlive is likely to be non-trivial ... /v -- Vincent Beffara UMPA - ENS-Lyon 46 allée d'Italie 69364 Lyon Cedex 07 Tél : 04 72 72 85 25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
