On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:28:30PM -0500, Robert Wyatt wrote: > Robert T Wyatt wrote: > > In trying to install pine-ssl in unstable: > > > > I'm not sure what's going on, but I think it might have to do with what > > seems to me like a catch-22: > > > > openssl097: Depends: openssl (>= 0.9.7m-5) > > > > openssl conflicts with openssl097, but openssl097 is installed > > Now that I've gotten some sleep and some coffee, it occurs to me that > I have a vague recollection that pine-ssl is not necessary. So while > this discussion may be moot, it may time to remove pine-ssl from the > PDB (if anyone has a better memory about this, please feel free to > chime in). I'll have to dig around and see if I can find the relevant > correspondence from I don't know how long ago.
pine was superceded by alpine upstream. Maybe time to replace pine and pine-ssl (both presently unmaintaind) with pointers to alpine (which is maintained)? The *pine builds are scary-nonstandard...no reason to keep obsolete stuff that is difficult to understand and build. dan -- Daniel Macks [email protected] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
