Fair enough - what are the criteria for moving packages into stable? I have been using that package for around a year now and it works great :)
I'm guessing that maintaining stable is a lot more work - do most people use unstable like me? Damian Max Horn wrote: > > Am 13.01.2010 um 22:19 schrieb Damian Dimmich: > >> fwiw - if the package has been around for 3 years, wouldn't it make >> sense to put it into stable? > > First off, I have no idea whether the Fink package has been around for > 3 years. > > Even if it is has been around that long, we don't move packages to > stable based on "how long" they have been in unstable. For all I know, > the package could have been there for 3 years and been broken during > all that time, only nobody tried it resp. nobody reported the issue. > > > Bye, > Max ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
