Thank you for the suggestions. I've updated the code accordingly with the same initial/boundary conditions previously mentioned and the graphing output will be inserted afterwards:
[code] from fipy import * import numpy as np #constants & parameters omega = 2.*np.pi*(1612.*10.**(6.)) #angular frequency of EM eps = 8.85*10**(-12.) c = 3.*(10.**8.) hbar = (6.626*10.**(-34.))/(2.*np.pi) eta = 0.01 #inversion factior nn = 10.**7. #population density n = eta*nn #inverted population density lambdaOH = c/(1612.*10.**(6.)) #wavelength gamma = 1.282*(10.**(-11.)) Tsp = 1./gamma TR = 604800. T1 = 210.*TR T2 = 210.*TR L = (Tsp/TR)*(8.*np.pi)/((3.*(lambdaOH**2.))*n) d = (3.*eps*c*hbar*(lambdaOH**2)*gamma/(4.*np.pi*omega))**0.5 #dipole transition element radius = np.sqrt(lambdaOH*L/np.pi) A = np.pi*(radius**2.) V = (np.pi*(radius**2.))*L NN = n*V #total inverted population constant3 = (omega*TR*NN*(d**2.)/(2.*c*hbar*eps*V)) Fn = 1. # Fresnel number = A/(lambdaOH*L) Lp = 1. #not scaling z yet Ldiff = Fn*L/0.35 theta0 = 4.7*(10.**(-5.)) #initial Bloch angle = 2/np.sqrt(NN*eta) zmax = L/Lp #final length of z domain tmax = 500. #final length of t domain if __name__ == "__main__": steps = nz = 500 else: steps = nz = 50 mesh = Grid1D(nx=nz, dx=(zmax/nz)) z = mesh.cellCenters[0] dz = (zmax/nz) #where nz = steps in this case dt = tmax/steps N1 = CellVariable(name=r"$N_1$", mesh=mesh, value = 0.5*np.sin(theta0), hasOld=True) #value here changes every element P1 = CellVariable(name=r"$P_1$", mesh=mesh, value = 0.5*np.cos(theta0), hasOld=True) #and sets values of function.old argument! P2 = CellVariable(name=r"$P_2$", mesh=mesh, value = 0., hasOld=True) # N1(z,0) = 0.5sin(theta_0), P1(z,0) = 0.5cos(theta_0) E1 = CellVariable(name=r"$E_1$", mesh=mesh) #E1 and E2 are not transient terms E2 = CellVariable(name=r"$E_2$", mesh=mesh) #therefore hasOld != True E1.setValue(0., where = z > z[nz-2]) # E1(L,t) = 0 E2.constrain(0., where = z > z[nz-2]) # E2(L,t) = 0 ones = CellVariable(mesh=mesh, value=(1), rank=1) #vector with values 1 ones0 = CellVariable(mesh=mesh, value=(1), rank=0) eq1 = (TransientTerm(var=N1) == ImplicitSourceTerm(coeff=-2.*E1, var=P2) + ImplicitSourceTerm(coeff= -2.*E2, var=P1) + ImplicitSourceTerm(coeff= -1./(T1/TR), var=N1)) eq2 = (TransientTerm(var=P1) == ImplicitSourceTerm(coeff=2.*E2, var=N1) + ImplicitSourceTerm(coeff= -1./(T2/TR), var=P1)) eq3 = (TransientTerm(var=P1) == ImplicitSourceTerm(coeff=2.*E1, var=N1) + ImplicitSourceTerm(coeff= -1./(T2/TR), var=P2)) eq4 = (CentralDifferenceConvectionTerm(coeff = ones, var=E1) == ImplicitSourceTerm(coeff=constant3, var=P2) + ImplicitSourceTerm(coeff=-1./Ldiff, var=E1)) eq5 = (CentralDifferenceConvectionTerm(coeff = ones, var=E2) == ImplicitSourceTerm(coeff=constant3, var=P1) + ImplicitSourceTerm(coeff=-1./Ldiff, var=E2)) eq = eq1 & eq2 & eq3 & eq4 & eq5 res = 1. elapsedTime = 0 while elapsedTime < tmax: N1.updateOld() P1.updateOld() P2.updateOld() while res > 1e-10: res = eq.sweep(dt=dt) print res print N1, P1, P2, E1, E2 elapsedTime += dt [/code] (note: the boundary conditions are at the end of the sample [i.e. z = L]) After making the recommend changes, the code appears to be updating as intended, but the results are still diverging. To work around this, I was looking through the different solvers (e.g. trilinosNonlinearSolver) and was wondering if there are any in particular you think would be of help for this nonlinear problem? I was also considering modifying the step size based on the rate of change of the solutions, but with diverging output, am uncertain on the best way to go about that. To firstly yield finite results, do you see any improvements in the above code? ________________________________ From: fipy-boun...@nist.gov <fipy-boun...@nist.gov> on behalf of Guyer, Jonathan E. Dr. (Fed) <jonathan.gu...@nist.gov> Sent: June 28, 2016 11:08:15 AM To: FIPY Subject: Re: FiPy for nonlinear, coupled PDEs in multiple independent variables > On Jun 27, 2016, at 6:44 PM, Abhilash Mathews <amath...@uwo.ca> wrote: > > Fair enough, thank you for the clarification. I've updated the code > accordingly: > When coupling the equations, should it be done separately for the partial > derivatives with respect to time and z (i.e. eq1, eq2, and eq3 are coupled > together, and eq4 and eq5 are coupled together since E1 or E2 is not updated > as N1, P1, and P2 are over the time steps)? You should couple all of the equations together, if you can. eq4 and eq5 are quasistatic, but the values of P1, P2, E1, and E2 are used in eq1, eq2, and eq3, so you want everything updating implicitly together. > > Also, with the current code, the variables do not appear to be evolving. This code is mixing up timesteps and sweeps. > while res > 1e-10: > res = eq.sweep(dt=dt) > N1.updateOld() > P1.updateOld() > P2.updateOld() > E1.updateOld() > E2.updateOld() > print E1, E2 Sweeping is about achieving convergence on the non-linear elements of your equations at a given timestep. Once converged, you can then advance to the next timestep (using .updateOld()). You need two nested loops to achieve this. See the example at the end of: http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy/documentation/FAQ.html#iterations-timesteps-and-sweeps-oh-my There are no TransientTerms for E1 and E2, so they should not be declared with `hasOld=True` and you should not call .updateOld() on them. This shouldn't be harmful, but in my experience it is sometimes. > I am using a 2D mesh grid for both the temporal and spatial domain considered > as I would eventually like to see how N1, P1, P2, E1, and E2 vary both on z > and t, but is this the correct approach? It seems as though it might not be > appropriately handled by the CentralDifferenceConvectionTerm when doing so. FiPy's meshes are purely spatial. They would not do the right thing if one of the dimensions is time. You would need to build up a separate 2D array if you want to visualize a sequence of time steps as a single image. _______________________________________________ fipy mailing list fipy@nist.gov http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
_______________________________________________ fipy mailing list fipy@nist.gov http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]