Em dom, 19 de jan de 2020 06:31, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel < [email protected]> escreveu:
> > > I've agreed that MD is much better for reviewing compared with > tool-written html. If we want to optimize our docs for good reviewing > let's go in this direction. In other aspects HTML appears better. - HTML is also not usable directly in github. And most people search in Google to find things. Offline docs should not be the priority. - HTML with embedded format makes each document have a different non standardized format. - HTML is not easily transformed to different formats. - A technical documentation does not need anything more than markdown offers. Markdown sources are good directly and with tools help may be used to produce docs in others formats (pdf, html). Adriano
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
