Hello: > > With Firebird, using the .Net 2.0 provider, it takes much longer. > Using FBCommand Insert statements, along with parameters for all > inserted fields, it take over 5 minutes on my very fast computer. > This could take possibly take up to 10 minutes on an average > computer. While this would still save 56k users time compared to > downloading an uncompressed file from the internet (saving about 40 > minutes), it would not be acceptable for our broadband users. Also, > reinstallation and upgrading would take an unacceptable amount of > time. People usually do not like software upgrades to be slower. > > > > Are there any techniques for inserting large numbers of records with > Firebird? I just cant see how Access 97, a 9 year old piece of > software, can outperform Firebird by such leaps and bounds. > Are you using transactions ?? Are you using the embedded or standalone firebird server ?? > > >
-- Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain http://carlosga.blogspot.com/ No hay un solo rey que no descienda de un esclavo, ni un esclavo que no haya tenido reyes en su familia. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
