OK - That being said, what is the difference? I thought a DMZ was a
screened subnet.
| -----Original Message-----
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of geoffrey
| Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2000 12:05 AM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: NT Network Browsing
|
|
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
| Hash: SHA1
|
| On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
|
| > The DMZ systems are on a different subnet, therefore cannot broadcast
| > themselves to the browse master.
|
| > | I have a Firewall-1 server running Windows NT with three NIC cards
| > | configured as follows:
| > |
| > | NIC 1 = Internal Net 10.X.X.X
| > | NIC 2 = DMZ zone 192.168.x.x
| > | NIC 3 = connection to router-real world address
|
| I have to pick semantics here. After all, this is a firewalls list. So,
| that having been said, what you describe here is a "screened subnet"; NOT
| a DMZ!!! This misuse of the term just bugs me. Sorry, I'm better now.
|
| geoffrey
| +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
| Two hundred ... forty dollars ...
| worth of puddin'! Aaah yeaaah!
|
| ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
| Key fingerprint ===> 3B5C 0F9E 4CE0 EEA7 980B 6F43 B342 23C8 EF21 48DF
| Public key available upon request.
|
|
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
| Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
| Charset: noconv
|
| iQA/AwUBOJ0BA7NCI8jvIUjfEQKhDQCfUCZE9+piHyNkK0F0fTdjzN9RQ1cAnix8
| ZH9qgxfmsLVjoysVWQYOPMCk
| =aiku
| -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| -
| [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
| "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
|
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
