-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Wasn't mjr the one who posted to this list a few months ago having
done this? I remember someone on this list writing about it (should
be in the archives, but I haven't searched). My recollection was it
was actual mail passing with a special account on each end to handle
the packaging/unpacking of the file info. Seems like it was done
through a site that only allowed email traffic when the original
poster needed to transfer some files from the outside.
Randy Graham
- -----Original Message-----
From: Behm, Jeffrey L. [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 9:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Mikael Olsson'
Subject: RE: Back Orifice 2000
Mikael,
Flames not intended (if perceived), I just don't understand...
This is the second time this week I have heard the below statement
made. I
am curious, are you talking about implemented via email(with data
sent back
as forth as payload data in an actual email) or implemented by using
the
email "standard ports" 25,109,110, etc?
I mean, I have seen NFS implemented on the NFS ports that didn't work
all
that great! ;-) (but it was PC client's trying to talk to Unix
servers -
Unix to Unix worked as expected)
>From: Mikael Olsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>People I know claim to have
>seen a slow but working version of NFS implemented on top of e-mail.
>
>
- ------------------
Jeff Behm
Unix System Admin.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- ------------------
- -
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.3
iQA/AwUBOZrRHhmX7SWIy+ClEQK3wwCgi0cm1xU5Xn0ZtKLkppDhf3kE390An0iH
yNnSNZoeJthpZLOV/Q0KttIy
=2VIk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
