On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Edward Ingram wrote:
> One is a Cisco PIX 515 and the other is a GNAT 1000 box.
> The GNAT is a less robust, but much cheaper solution. Since we are a
> relatively small company, cost IS a big issue here, however, I would
> like to know which is the better solution in regards to
> security/price.
if you're goimng to play with GNAT, i would suggest playing with OpenBSD
and IPF, along with OpenBSD's IPSec VPNs. the OpenBSD kernel is among the
finest in the business, IPF has features too many firewalls can't offer,
and the price seems to be right for you: free.
give it a whirl: http://www.openbsd.org/
as a note, several commercial offers are based on OpenBSD.
you didn't note what features you need, just some data to protect. so ..
with that limited info i make my suggestions to you to investigate
OpenBSD/IPF.
____________________________
jose nazario [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP: 89 B0 81 DA 5B FD 7E 00 99 C3 B2 CD 48 A0 07 80
PGP key ID 0xFD37F4E5 (pgp.mit.edu)
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
