On Sunday 15 January 2006 11:38, dene maxwell wrote: > this certainly seems to follow the geometric logic. One problem...it > doesn't seem to work. > > Without being familiar with the code concerned, my impression is that this > logic is not being applied in a way that produces the desired result or > something very important is being over looked in the logic.
It doesn't work because TerrorGear doesn't do it. Nothing is broken because there's no code to do it yet. :) If I'm not mistaken TerrorGear doesn't take the elevation into account at all when doing the UV mapping - it only uses the elevation data to build the irregular triangulated mesh. The UV mapping calculations are done by calculating the horizontal distances between vertices in the mesh. Someone correct me if I'm wrong. Paul ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
