Thorsten wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From:[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 30 June 2011 13:21 > To: FlightGear developers discussions > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] A couple of random oddities > > > Further research indicates that the F1A, modeled here was NOT capable of > > M2.0 at 36000ft. M1.9 seem more likely. Moreover, due to structural and > > stability problems the F1A was operationally limited to M1.7 or > > approximately 700KIAS. We have pushed a small change in Mach drag to > > model this better. Ron will look at the Mach stability issue a bit > later. > > I plead guilty - yes, it seems I overlooked the mark... > > Still, I think some discrepancy remains, and thanks to everyone for > looking into it! The Lightning really is a great model. >
We think it's pretty close now in Git - apart from stability - see what you think. But it was well worth revisiting, so thanks for the heads-up. Vivian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
