All right I have mirrod the SQL config stuff for PostgreSQL.I have also included the component table name patch.
-d
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Stefan Lieser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> Hi Chad,
>
> thats a good idea! I would prefer this over the lambda syntax you posted
> before.
>
> And we could have both: fluent api and initializer syntax.
>
> ConnectionString.Is(
> ConnectionString
> .Server("foo")
> .Database("bar"))
>
> vs.
>
> ConnectionString.Is(
> new ConnectionString {
> Server = "foo",
> Database = "bar"});
>
>
> BUT I see one problem with this: discoverability. The
> ConnectionStringExpression classes have the necessary properties so that
> you will find them in IntelliSense. With the ConnectionString class you
> have to know that it exists.
>
> And the second problem is with different databases. There will be an
> MsSqlConnectionstring and a PostgreSqlConnectionString. To make this
> "typesafe" we need special parameter types for the In(...) method.
>
> So maybe its better to stick with the solution we just started?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan Lieser
>
>
> Chad Myers schrieb:
> > Hrm. What if we had a separate connection string builder that might have
> > wider applicability (outside of Fluent NHib).
> >
> >
> >
> > Fluent NHib could use it, as could any one else.
> >
> >
> >
> > ConnectionString.Is( new ConnectionString{ Server = "foo",
> > Database="bar", etc, etc} );
> >
> >
> >
> > Of course, the ConnectionString object could have a fluent API as well.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> >
> >
> > -c
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Dru Sellers
> > *Sent:* Saturday, September 13, 2008 10:35 AM
> > *To:* fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
> > *Subject:* [fluent-nhib] Re: Fluent ConfigurationString
> >
> >
> >
> > Q1. Do we like the idea of a connection string builder?
> >
> > A1. Yes
> >
> > Q2. Does it have to hang off of the NHConfig object?
> >
> > A2. No
> >
> > Q3. What's wrong with your lambda?
> >
> > A3. ??
> >
> >
> >
> > -d
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Chad Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >
> > The problem is, you have a sub-FI for the connection string and you're
> > "on that path" so there is no 'ToProperties' on the
> > 'ConnectionStringExpression' (or whatever it'll be called)
> >
> >
> >
> > Unless we put it there, but then that will end the ENTIRE config path.
> > What if you want to add other config properties AFTER your connection
> > string?
> >
> >
> >
> > We could say that the connection string MUST be the last one, but I'm
> > not crazy about that idea, either.
> >
> >
> >
> > -c
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
> > <mailto:fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com>
> > [mailto:fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
> > <mailto:fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com>] *On Behalf Of *Dru Sellers
> > *Sent:* Saturday, September 13, 2008 10:16 AM
> >
> >
> > *To:* fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
> > <mailto:fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com>
> >
> > *Subject:* [fluent-nhib] Re: Fluent ConfigurationString
> >
> >
> >
> > The 'create' could be called internally when the .ToProperties is called.
> >
> >
> >
> > -d
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Chad Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Yeah, cool stuff!
> >
> > I'm not super crazy about the 'Create' though. For some reason,
> > dead-end paths smell to me. I'm not sure why, because it's not that bad.
> >
> > How 'bout
> >
> > .ConnectionString.Is(c=>c
> >
> > .Server("db-srv")
> > .Database("tables")
> >
> > .Username("scott")
> > .Password("tiger"))
> > .ToProperties();
> >
> > ?? Is that much better. Maybe not, I dunno.
> >
> > -c
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
> > <mailto:fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com>
> > [mailto:fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
> > <mailto:fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com>] On Behalf Of Stefan Lieser
> > Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 8:53 AM
> > To: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
> > <mailto:fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com>
> > Subject: [fluent-nhib] Fluent ConfigurationString
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > what do you think about a fluent way to build connection strings?
> >
> > MsSqlConfiguration.MsSql2005
> > .ConnectionString
> > .Server("db-srv")
> > .Database("tables")
> > .Username("toni tester")
> > .Password("secret")
> > .Create
> > .ToProperties();
> >
> > I've started to implement this and would contribute it as a patch.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Stefan Lieser
> > --
> > http://nhplugin.lieser-online.de
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1669 - Release Date:
> 12.09.2008 14:18
> >
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
PostgreSQLConnStr.patch
Description: Binary data
ComponentTableName.patch
Description: Binary data
