+1 for consistency with NH

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Chad Myers <c...@chadmyers.com> wrote:

> It was hard-coded in the template and not able to be changed by users.
>
> I recently added the ability from the Conventions to change this, but it's
> still =false by default to preserve compat for existing FluNHib users.
>
> I'm in favor of making it to be in line with NHibernate (default-lazy=true)
> for consistency.  I doubt too many people will be affected negatively by
> this and the fix is extremely easy.
>
> Vote + 1 for making it consistent with NHibernate by default.
>
> -c
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com on behalf of Andrew Stewart
> Sent: Thu 12/11/2008 4:11 PM
> To: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [fluent-nhib] Re: Default lazy default value
>
>
> Hi Jeremy
>
> I thought I'd remembered that being changed but was never sure why it
> wasn't.
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Jeremy D. Miller <jeremydmil...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>        I had thought you guys had changed that to be lazy loading by
> default.
>
>        I can't say that I completely agree with Ayende on this one, but I
> don't really care.  It's one line of code in your
> PersistenceModel.Conventions either way.
>
>
>        Jeremy D. Miller
>         The Shade Tree Developer <
> http://codebetter.com/blogs/jeremy.miller>
>         jeremydmil...@yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>        From: Andrew Stewart <andrew.stew...@i-nnovate.net>
>        To: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
>        Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:49:33 PM
>        Subject: [fluent-nhib] Re: Default lazy default value
>
>
>        Hi Oren
>
>        This is a legacy setting I vaguely remember from an earlier
> discussion that it's to do with the fact that fluent nhibernate was pulled
> out of jeremy's own code and he was using lazy load off by default - so it
> was kept that way for historical reasons. Is that correct Jeremy?
>
>        Cheers
>
>        Andy
>
>        PS. I had the same opinion when I first saw it though, so know where
> your coming from.
>
>
>        On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Ayende Rahien <aye...@ayende.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>                Trying out NH Prof with fluent nhibernate gave me a heart
> attack today, as I saw a single statement translate into _many_ queries.
>                Leaving aside the fact that I was very happy to find that NH
> Prof can detect that, I traced that down to DefaultLazyLoad being false by
> default.
>                This is the wrong default, I believe, since we want to
> encourage more lazy load, not less, and it should match the NH defaults.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>        --
>
>        =================
>        I-nnovate Software - Bespoke Software Development, uk wirral.
>         http://www.i-nnovate.net <http://www.i-nnovate.net/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> =================
> I-nnovate Software - Bespoke Software Development, uk wirral.
> http://www.i-nnovate.net <http://www.i-nnovate.net/>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
fluent-nhibernate+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to