I like the idea of a tool that will generate class maps based on hbm xml, but I suspect that the significant amount of change that our API is currently undergoing is a barrier. Keeping the tool up to date could be quite a burden.
Have you already ruled out automapping? On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:13 PM, bbehrens <brandonbehr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I was wondering if any of the project owners would like to have a > ClassMap<T> generator. The idea is you take existing .hbm files and > it creates the ClassMaps for you. Exactly like you can go from > ClassMap files to .hbm files. > > I've been looking hard at FNH for the past week or so. I showed it to > one of my team members and his first response was "you mean we'd have > to go through that mapping process again?" I thought about it figured > one of the major benefits of FNH is you can get away from the mapping > files. Why not make the barrier of entry less painful for people > wanting to go with FNH over traditional .hbm mapping files? > > I'm going to write some a patch for our internal use that will do > that. I would be happy to contribute the code to the project if there > is any interest. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
