If it's doable in the current code-base, then I say go for it. If I remember correctly, it's more just because I just didn't have the time than any impossibility.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Martin Hornagold < martin.hornag...@marstangroup.com> wrote: > James, > > > > Thanks. Figured as much, just wanted to check I wasn’t missing anything. > > Is it worth any of us investigating promoting components to first class > citizens on the trunk? > > Or do you think this is something that should be left for the rewrite? > > > > Martin > > > > *From:* fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com [mailto: > fluent-nhibern...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *James Gregory > *Sent:* 23 March 2009 13:01 > *To:* fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* [fluent-nhib] Re: Overriding Components > > > > Hey Martin, > > > > It's kind of alluded to at the start of this wiki > page<http://wiki.fluentnhibernate.org/show/AutoMappingComponents>, > but barely, components are relatively unsupported with automapping; you > either automap them completely, or not at all. So stuff like ignoring is not > supported. There's no technical reason for this, just that I haven't had the > requests to implement this behavior yet. > > > > Your only real alternative is to not automap the components at all, and to > do it manually. > > > > ForTypesThatDeriveFrom<MyTypeWithAComponent>(m => > > { > > m.Component(x => x.MyComponent, c => > > { > > // map all the component fields manually > > }); > > }); > > > > It's not nice, but I think that's your only option currently. > > > > Components will become first class citizens in automapping at some point, > it's just a matter of when. I've raised an > issue<http://code.google.com/p/fluent-nhibernate/issues/detail?id=156>so this > won't get forgotten about. > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Martin < > martin.hornag...@marstangroup.com> wrote: > > > James/Paul, > > Currently there appears to be no easy way of overriding the mapping of > components when using auto persistence. > I have a value object that has a public readonly property I need to > ignore in the mappings. > If I use IAutoMappingOverride it tries to map the value object as an > entity and therefore fails as there is no Id. > Do you have any plans on the radar to add an > IAutoComponentMappingOverride<T>? > Alternatively is there an easy way to add a convention to ignore > readonly proeprties? > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
