Thank you Hudson,
but I still can't make it working. Could you please take a quick look
at my example ?
here are my classess (one abstract and one conrete). I have more
concrete classess like Contractor, but didn't want to include for
brevity.
public abstract class DictionaryBase : Entity
{
protected DictionaryBase() { }
public DictionaryBase(string name) { Name = name; }
[DomainSignature]
public virtual string Name { get; set; }
public virtual string Description { get; set; }
}
public class Contractor : DictionaryBase
{
protected Contractor() {}
public Contractor(string name) : base(name)
}
and the mappings:
public class DictionaryBaseMap :
IAutoMappingOverride<DictionaryBase>
{
public void Override(AutoMap<DictionaryBase> mapping)
{
mapping.JoinedSubClass<Contractor>("Id", c =>
{
c.Map(element => element.Name);
c.Map(element => element.Description);
c.WithTableName(Inflector.Pluralize(typeof
(Contractor).Name));
});
}
}
This creates me a correct table of "Contractors" with and Id, Name and
Description but also creates me "DictionaryBases" (which I get mapped
because of defaults of SharpArch (to look at every object that
dervices from Entity and apply to it set of conventions, such as table
name that is pluralized, etc). How can I exclude here mapping for
DictionaryBase ?
I took a look at mapping.Not - maybe this way, but I can't find the
way to succeed.
thanks once again,
Łukasz
On 16 Cze, 15:01, Hudson Akridge <hudson.akri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In FNH, it would be a .JoinedSubClass("columnName",x=>
> x.YourSubClassMappingHere);
> Although as a point of contention, one of the reasons why the table per
> class hierarchy is default, is because it's the easiest to use in the
> database, and it's also the best performing option. Having done a fairly
> complex system using both ways, the table per class hierarchy is far better
> performing.
>
> 2009/6/16 Łukasz Podolak <lukasz.podo...@gmail.com>
>
>
>
> > By default, the inheritance mapping is "table per class hierarchy". I
> > have a "DictionaryBase" class and couple of derived classes from it.
> > How can I tell fnh to map all my derived classes as single tables and
> > not to map DictionaryBase at all ? Can be fluent or automapping,
> > whichever gets job done. For now I can only accomplish such mapppings
> > when my concrete dictionary classes .. do not inherit from base, but I
> > wouldn't like it to live this way.
>
> > I'm using SharpArch's defaults if this is any prompt.
> > thanks for any help
>
> > Łukasz
>
> --
> - Hudsonhttp://www.bestguesstheory.comhttp://twitter.com/HudsonAkridge
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
fluent-nhibernate+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
