On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 22:14 +0800, Michael Richter wrote: > I think having the simple syntax we have now is fine, even if > suboptimal compared to my poison (Markdown).
But that's just it: any of the major wiki engines would be better. So why not just use one? I'd rather write textile than fossil wiki. I imagine most textile users would rather write markdown than fossil wiki. Just because we can't make everyone happy doesn't mean we have to make almost everyone unhappy. (Not wanting to be ungrateful, though. I'm a happy fossil user, just not very happy with the wiki markup situation.) -- Joshua Paine LetterBlock: Web applications built with joy http://letterblock.com/ 301-576-1920 _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
