On 5/7/2010 1:11 AM, Gour wrote: > On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:22:14 -0400 > >>>>>>> "Jeremy" == Jeremy Cowgar wrote: >>>>>>> > Jeremy> People are going to be attracted to fossil as an all in one > Jeremy> package and if it can not provide the functionality needed in > Jeremy> the wiki, then people will say why use Fossil for SCM and then > Jeremy> have to interface in with another Wiki system? I now have to > Jeremy> piece together a system, thus, why not just piece together a > Jeremy> different SCM as well. > > The above point nicely expresses why I became interested to have more > usable (or Markdown) wiki. > > Seeing your Josl site, I'm curious if you're using Asciidoc since it's > obvious it does not use default wiki? >
For the manual I am using Docbook. For the wiki, I am using Fossil, but it has HTML enabled and is only editable by me, thus, defunct as a wiki. I'm actually going to be removing it from the tab group and doing without a wiki for a while. I did have the wiki enabled for a while and some contributors just about fell over when they had to type in HTML and they simply didn't, so it is defunct anyway. I'm a strong supporter for any standard wiki format. Sure, not everyone is going to agree on the standard but that's a choice that has to be made. Not everyone agrees with what exists now. The point is, without a more usable wiki, it's not usable as a wiki to me. I gave up. Jeremy _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
