On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 07:00:27PM -0800, Russ Paielli wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger > <jo...@britannica.bec.de>wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:38:54PM -0800, Russ Paielli wrote: > > > My organization currently uses Clearcase for a project with something > > > like 20 developers and 2MLOC. Would I be crazy to recommend fossil? > > Thanks. > > > > Can you translate that into number of files in a working copy and > > average size? > > > > > I can't easily get that information without bothering someone else to get it > for me. Is it important? As I said before, I personally don't use Clearcase. > I've looked at some of the aforementioned code several years ago, and as far > as I know the files are typically several pages each when printed out, some > longer and some shorter.
You asked about scalability to large repositories. It helps a lot to see what you understand with that in terms of numbers that actually reflect the work somewhat. It doesn't have to be precise, but at least the order of magnitude is relevant for your question. Joerg _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
