how abouth this: http://buildconf.brlcad.org

2011/6/15 Michal Suchanek <hramr...@centrum.cz>:
> On 15 June 2011 07:55, Matt Welland <estifo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> All of these alternative build systems are a PITA on one system or another.
>> If it requires jam, cmake or anything that requires installing prerequisites
>> 9 times out of 10 I won't even try that software unless there is a binary
>> install available somewhere or a pre-assembled Makefile.
>>
>> I thought that from an end user perspective all that is needed with autoconf
>> is sh. The requirement is on the developer to run autoconf before making the
>> tar. I thought autoconf itself is not needed on the platform where the build
>> is being done, correct??
>
> So long as you get all the tests right, yes.
>
> However, in my experience most autotoolized projects require some
> patches to random parts, and most often the auto* parts requiring the
> auto* suite on the user's system.
>
> For a long time building on OS X required regenerating the auto* parts
> of pretty much everything because only fresh autotools supported it,
> and scripts generated by older tools failed (and everybody used some
> random old autotools). That's for an experience from slightly exotic
> platform.
>
> The alternatives usually require the configuration tool to be present
> to generate *any* makefile skipping the intermediate shell script
> step.
>
> This seems like a drawback but consider that
>
>  - in many cases when you have to build the tools in question you
> would have to build autotools to regenerate the shell script anyway
>  - the tools are available for most platforms anyway
>  - cross-building is an option for overly uncooperative exotic platforms
>  - not relying on the intermediate shell script makes maintenance and
> dependency tracking easier
>
> I would like to see, eg. platforms supported by autotools out of the
> box that don't have CMake or Python.
>
> Thanks
>
> Michal
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>



-- 
Alexander Vladimirov <idkfa at idkfa dot org dot ru>
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to