On 2014-05-08 16:18, Rich Neswold wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Andy Bradford
<amb-sendok-1402034378.gfecjnjggaibliman...@bradfords.org> wrote:
Thus said Rich Neswold on Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:40:23 -0500:
It would be nice if fossil would break the "pull" into smaller
transactions which contain valid timeline commits so, if there's a
database timeout, the next time I try to "pull" it can continue where
it left off.
Does SQLite support nested transactions? If so, that would seem to be
worth considering.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
