2009/1/22 Erik Moeller <e...@wikimedia.org>: > 2009/1/21 Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com>: >> Whether or not something is sufficient to comply with licensing >> requirements isn't something that can be decided democratically. > > We're operating in a space with a high degree of ambiguity. The point > would be to determine whether there's a clear and shared expectation > of what constitutes reasonable attribution requirements or not. It > would be an information gathering poll, rather than a decision-making > vote.
You need to be very careful how you interpret it, since it's a self-selecting sample. The people sufficiently committed to the projects to vote (eg. not people that edited once or twice and then left) are more likely than the general population of editors to be tolerant of bending the rules for the benefit of the projects, I would think. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
