The benefit is in getting users who would not be comfortable on Wikipedia because of the perceived and real behavior problems on that site--even if this is no worse ultimately than in the academic world, the mode of interaction is certainly very different. Why do we assume the present editing environment can serve everyone's purposes optimally?
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/2/19 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>: >> Hoi, >> Thomas OTHER people can see this benefit.. It is not that hard.. even I can. > > Then would you care to explain it to me? > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > -- David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
