Daniël Mantione wrote: > > Op Wed, 16 Nov 2005, schreef Micha Nelissen: > > >>Daniël Mantione wrote: >> >>>To be short, Juras B. wants to add a Unicode Win32 target, so in the >>>standard RTL things like Tlist etc. use ansistrings, while in the Unicode >>>RTL they use widestrings. >> >>Why not use ansistrings with UTF-8 ? > > > Because then you will have to modify routines like pos, insert, delete. > Since that is not possible, you would get a pos_utf8, insert_utf8, etc.
No, why? When working with utf-8 strings, you don't use character positions. > > >>>IMHO this is indeed a good solution, but one with consequences. Could >>>somebody give his opinion? >> >>You postpone a decision that no one wants to make. It is not a solution to >>anything. The RTL will have duplicate code. I don't like it. > > > I don't like it either. > > Daniël > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
