On 29/11/2007, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I only know that a corba interface needs to be identified somehow > otherwise it cant be looked up. (which can't atm) > Be it through GUID, name or vtm. >
So based on all these discussions on Corba interfaces, I can only make one conclusion. FPC's Corba interfaces support is not ready yet. So I'll stay with COM based interfaces and remove reference counting if required. BTW: I searched the FPC and Lazarus code and couldn't find any TNonRefCountedObject class (or something with a similar name). I have seen many implementations of such a class on the internet and everybody seems to implement it in the same way. Wouldn't it then be a good idea to add such a class into the RTL for convenience. Why must every developer always reinvent the wheel if they want non-reference counted COM interfaces. Regards, - Graeme - _______________________________________________ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
