Ok,but if time is the only problem then why do not simple add the feature in the official and definitive 2.4 roadmap and try to add it in the next 6/12/24 months?
Is also possible add it as undocumented feature (as generics in 2.2) in the next 2.4 version and finish its implementation and testing in the 2.6 version. 2007/12/26, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Fabio Dell'Aria schrieb: > > Why is not possible add the package support as is on Delphi (using > > Rtl.bpl, Vcl.bpl ...)? > > Time? > > > > > Only if my project is compiled with packajes I must use all base > > packages, otherwise I can continue to compile my project as today just > > do Freepascal. > > > > 2007/12/26, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Daniël Mantione wrote: > >>>> Did i miss something, technically? Is necessary to compile with rtl > >>>> packages to distribute custom packages? > >>> Yes. Well, unless you want the RTL statically linked into each > >>> package, which will not work in a compatible way due the one > >>> heap/multiple heaps issues. > >>> > >>> There is a solution though: Distribute the rtl in source code form and > >>> compile it on installation. This could also be an advantage for > >>> setting up cross compilation environments. But don't get excited yet: > >>> We may or may not move to such a system in the future. > >>> > >> Thanks for the info. With this picture, i'm in favor of staying like is > >> today. No packages. > >> > >> Luiz > >> _______________________________________________ > >> fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org > >> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel > -- Best regards... Fabio Dell'Aria. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
