Hi May I ask why do we need a CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT=y in the kernel to for fpc to work on arm-linux?
regards Nataraj On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Jeppe Johansen <jepj...@kom.aau.dk> wrote: > Well, this is off topic, but ARM is quite a bit backwards compatible. All > ARM versions are backwards compatible(if we ignore thumb, which fpc doesn't > support anyway) :) > > Geoffrey Barton skrev: > > >> On 14 Jul 2010, at 10:49, Bernd Mueller wrote: >> >> Michael Schnell wrote: >>> >>>> On 07/14/2010 11:02 AM, Bernd Mueller wrote: >>>> >>>>> ... which could easily be done in gcc btw. ... >>>>> >>>> I'm quite sure that FPC's ASM can compile hex constants (using "DC" ???) >>>> >>> >>> that is not the point. You don't wont to bother with (error prone) hex >>> constants, but want to use the regular assembler mnemonics. >>> >> >> quite right! especially with a processor like the ARM, where it keeps, >> er.., improving its instruction set between each generation of hardware! >> >> rgds, >> Geoffrey >> >> >>> >>> Regards, Bernd. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org >>> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org >> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel >> > > _______________________________________________ > fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel >
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
