Henry Vermaak schrieb:
Build systems seem to be a constant itch. See a list here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_build_automation_software
Shouldn't we add FPC to that list?
IMO the list completely ignores the existence of platform independent
development systems, like for Basic, Java, .NET and other interpreted or
VM-based languages. It's a selfmade complication, when a compiler-based
programming language allows for a platform-independent RTL, and that
chance is not taken in writing portable applications. In so far a
portable gcc is only half baked, without an equally portable libc (and
other libraries) - at least for writing really portable code.
DoDi
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
