Handling 1..4(6) bytes is less efficient than handling surrogate *pairs*. =============== But surrogate pairs break array-like fast char access anyway, isn't it ? And there's a lot of room for optimizing utf-8 operation for instance http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de/utf-8/decoder/dfa/. Also a publication at http://www.utf8everywhere.org/. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Marco van de Voort
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Jonas Maebe
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Hans-Peter Diettrich
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Mattias Gaertner
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Martin Schreiber
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Hans-Peter Diettrich
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Mattias Gaertner
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Ivanko B
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Ivanko B
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Martin Schreiber
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Ivanko B
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Aleksa Todorovic
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Hans-Peter Diettrich
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Graeme Geldenhuys
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Martin Schreiber
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Graeme Geldenhuys
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Aleksa Todorovic
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Mattias Gaertner
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Aleksa Todorovic
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Michael Schnell
- Re: [fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings Michael Schnell